View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2013, 03:53 PM
Jackster's Avatar
Jackster Jackster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 1,641
Jackster has a brilliant futureJackster has a brilliant futureJackster has a brilliant futureJackster has a brilliant futureJackster has a brilliant futureJackster has a brilliant futureJackster has a brilliant futureJackster has a brilliant futureJackster has a brilliant futureJackster has a brilliant futureJackster has a brilliant future
Default Re: Rod designation question

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetandsalt View Post
Due to the non-conforming-to-any-standard that rod makers use to designate rod models, I have tried to set, by example, NOT using such unclear numerical codes in favor of a descriptive length/line weight. Hence; 8 1/2'/#4 4pc. just can not be confused with anything but what it is. 486-4 is to me a model number not a description.
I fully agree. Until I figured out the code with my Sag decoder ring I had to think too much with their method of rod designation.
9', 5 wt., 4 pc says it all plain and clearly.
Reply With Quote