View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2009, 03:22 PM
badfishunter badfishunter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 8
badfishunter is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Upper Clackamas Bull Trout Reintroduction

Frank,
Thanks for the response. My initial reaction to this was "wrong". I got a mental picture of some ODFW folks sittin 'round with to much time on their hands. One say's 'Hey, let's dump some Bull's in the Clack and see what happens...I mean, they were there in '63?" Point being, this needs a bit of scrutiny.
Many of our on-going problems with fishery systems across this great country have started at least in part with "people with titles" thinking that there's something wrong with a particular system.... then wanting to "fix" it. I understand the Bull Trout got hog-tied with a bad rap as an "aggressor" and had some bad times because of that. But that was our fore-fathers deal, not ours. 46 years later, the Clackamas is a different river, and we need to take a more pro-active "up-to-date" approach to it.
This smells of "fast-track" to me with the rumors of starting this transition by next summer already being bandied about. Your idea of the Salmon/Steelhead issue getting glossed over needs some attention as well. I am already in research mode on this.
At this point I might interject with a bump to Stewardship. These animals that we all enjoy so much and the systems where they reside CAN NOT speak for themselves. They need folks who will watch out for their well being. They need Advocates! Just a bit of a heads up, if all Sportsman and Woman spent a small amount of time each year working for the good of their particular flora and fauna, we could initiate tremendous change.
I hope to have an up-date on this soon.
Comments to ODFW are due Feb.8, '10
J
Reply With Quote