![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
||
|
Welcome to the North American Fly Fishing Forum, the premier discussion group and information source for fly fishing North America. Our experienced membership can answer your questions and make your fly fishing adventures successful. You are currently viewing as a guest which gives you limited access to some features. By joining this forum you will have full access to all special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so Join now and we'll send you some FREE stuff.
* FREE Casting Book "Excerpts: Cast Like a Pro" * FREE Forum Fly Shop $10 Discount Voucher Join now and you'll also get $10 off any $50 purchase at the Forum Fly Shop. Get the gear you need and save money too. |
| Forum Portal | Blogs | Articles | Gear Reviews | Fly Tyer's Round Table | Back at the Lodge | Classifieds | Arcade |
|
|||||||
| General Discussion General discussions regarding fly fishing as a whole. Ask questions. Get answers... |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Re: Too much
Dood, I hate to sound like the curmudgeonly old English teacher, but punctuation and spelling are kinda important.
It is true that lots of great flies are just pieces of other flies pasted together, but this really is an inevitability. There's only so many things that can be done on a hook with a 3/4" long shank and so many techniques to make feathers look like fish. To really develop something that isn't just a re-arranging of other flies parts, you have to come up with new tying techniques. Good luck dood, it's tough.
__________________
Forum Moderator "Through fishing and hunting, we are confronted with the fact that we are part of the web of life and the natural world, NOT apart from the natural order of things, as our daily lives may often suggest." Ed Engleman
|
|
||||
|
Re: Too much
just putting it out there. It just seams that, for example, the Clouser Minnow has been copied so many times but they all look the same. They'd all work the same and have the same way they are made. So what makes one better then the other. I know I got a few patterns that I've either seen one other on the web or not at all. But the others I got just dont need to be renamed just because I made them from copying some other pattern
__________________
<*))))>< Fish with teeth ... If I ty it a fish will hit it
Last edited by MrEsox; 08-21-2008 at 02:45 PM. Reason: + |
|
|||
|
Re: Too much
I tie all my flies also and I have come to believe in only 1 fly!!
Bob Clouser was one of the first to use the wonderful lead barbell eyes. When he tied the lead on the top of the shank, the streamer became weedless!! He put his name on everything with lead eyes! A regular Clouser "stinks" in my opinion. It looks terrible in the water...... but I tie those wonderful lead eyes on my woolybuggers and on my rabbit fur buggers. I've used a all marabou Clouser or a rabbit fur Clouser, but they are no where as good as a lead eye bugger. It's fun to tie flies and you are correct that everyone wants to put their name on a modified woolybugger!! Even with dry flies, the only ones that work well are a small woolybugger with dry fly hackle. The great poppers are a woolybugger with some foam and rubber legs added!! The popular Hare's Ear nymph is only a tiny woolybugger with a dub body!! A much better producer is a bugger the same size with tiny chenelle or a dub body. Harry's Hellgramite is only a woolybugger with two rubber strips in front and peacock for a tail!!! I've tied some and I must say that the marabou works much better and the rubber in front only makes the fly twist!! There....... a lifetime of testing flies and the woolybugger is by far the best!! A lot of great flyguys only use woolybuggers and nothing else!! ......... me included!
__________________
"People are crazy, times are strange" "I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range" "I used to care, but things have changed" - Dylan |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|