![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
||
|
Welcome to the North American Fly Fishing Forum, the premier discussion group and information source for fly fishing North America. Our experienced membership can answer your questions and make your fly fishing adventures successful. You are currently viewing as a guest which gives you limited access to some features. By joining this forum you will have full access to all special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so Join now and we'll send you some FREE stuff.
* FREE Casting Book "Excerpts: Cast Like a Pro" * FREE Forum Fly Shop $10 Discount Voucher Join now and you'll also get $10 off any $50 purchase at the Forum Fly Shop. Get the gear you need and save money too. |
| Forum Portal | Blogs | Articles | Gear Reviews | Fly Tyer's Round Table | Back at the Lodge | Classifieds | Arcade |
|
|||||||
| Warmwater Fly Fishing Bass, Bream, Perch, etc... |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Re: Smaller rod for smaller streams and creeks?
I do. That is why I bought the 5'3" glass rod and I had a 7' Lamiglass 4wt built. But I also have a 6' 3wt (W.W.Griggs). Doesn't cast worth a crap, but a great brushy area stick. Went to small creek in American Fork, I sling shot the flie under a bridge with my Hubby watching. The tip started twitching, so he asked if that was me or a fish...I smiled and said a fish. It was LOL
There is no way you could take a 8' or longer rod in this stretch. But I also took that Griggs to the Provo, and while I caught fish, it was a struggle to get the line out, so that rod does have it's limits. The 5'3" takes a few minutes to get the timing down, but it cast 60 ft fairly easy. Not needed for that creek, but I just mean that short rods can be multitasking if you get the right one.
__________________
http://utahflygoddess.blogspot.com/ |
|
||||
|
Re: Smaller rod for smaller streams and creeks?
In some of those situations a shorter rod is the way to go, but you also sometimes may be better off with your 9' rod. If the cover is so thick behind you that you can't cast overhead, the longer rod will work better for roll casting. I spent many an afternoon after class crouched down on the banks of the San Antonio River in Brackenridge Park doing exactly this. (Bass, sunfish, RGP's, and Tilapia all there, can't pass that up. As to whether fishing is officially allowed in the park, I'm pleading the fifth.) So if you've got low cover overhead, but room for a backcast, then a short rod may be the way to go. But if you can't backcast, you can roll cast much further with a 9' rod than you can with a 6 footer. Casting sidearm can help lots also. -----------------------------------------(gotta break this up some)--------------------------------------------------Yet another technique is a backcast delivery. Its exactly like it sounds, instead of presenting the fly on the forward cast, you just position yourself and your cast so that the delivery is on the back cast. So if you were standing in a tightly canopied river, facing upstream, and closer to the left bank, but wanted to cast downstream from where you are, you could do so with a back cast delivery. It takes some practice, but can be very useful. It can also come in handy on windy days so that the wind isn't blowing your cast into you.
__________________
Forum Moderator "Through fishing and hunting, we are confronted with the fact that we are part of the web of life and the natural world, NOT apart from the natural order of things, as our daily lives may often suggest." Ed Engleman
|
|
||||
|
Re: Smaller rod for smaller streams and creeks?
I know this may seem like a "fly fisherman's cop out,but try using an ultralight spinning rod. ( Most are onlyabout 5.5' to 6' in length & work well for bluegill, etc. )If you want to use a fly rod try using the "slingshot" cast.The only drawback using this method is the length of thecast. Try practicing first. It maybe an option to try. Oryou could always "roll cast" for them too.Best of Luck,Tie One On
|
|
||||
|
Re: Smaller rod for smaller streams and creeks?
How does one hold onto a spinning rod? This seems problematic and could possibly cause nasty blisters. I know nothing of this spinning rod jibberish.
__________________
Forum Moderator "Through fishing and hunting, we are confronted with the fact that we are part of the web of life and the natural world, NOT apart from the natural order of things, as our daily lives may often suggest." Ed Engleman
|
|
||||
|
Re: Smaller rod for smaller streams and creeks?
Bruce, Some times if you are fishing small streams that you can't wade, a longer rod is useful. You can poke in-between bushes and trees. Kind of like a high stick drift. I grew up in California and fished a lot of small streams with a long fly rod with a under lever spin reel. I used 4lb mono and fished salmon eggs. There was no real cast I just used a line the length of the rod and fliped it out. It was very effective for catching small trout. Frank
|
|
||||
|
Re: Smaller rod for smaller streams and creeks?
These Creeks that I fish have a cliff behind you and trees that meet in the middle over hanging the river. True you could just point a longer rod out over the river and let it drift down, but very problemmatic to get it back up the river, let alone chancing breaking a tip trying to get there. Little 6' rods can be flipped, specially a glass rod which would allow you to roll cast or sling shot it.
As far a spinning gear AHHHHH! my ears! Chicken!!! LOL
__________________
http://utahflygoddess.blogspot.com/ |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Perfect Small Stream Fly Rod - By Steve Robbins | Fish Bones | Coldwater Articles | 4 | 04-25-2006 03:07 PM |