![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
||
|
Welcome to the North American Fly Fishing Forum, the premier discussion group and information source for fly fishing North America. Our experienced membership can answer your questions and make your fly fishing adventures successful. You are currently viewing as a guest which gives you limited access to some features. By joining this forum you will have full access to all special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so Join now and we'll send you some FREE stuff.
* FREE Casting Book "Excerpts: Cast Like a Pro" * FREE Forum Fly Shop $10 Discount Voucher Join now and you'll also get $10 off any $50 purchase at the Forum Fly Shop. Get the gear you need and save money too. |
| Forum Portal | Blogs | Articles | Gear Reviews | Fly Tyer's Round Table | Back at the Lodge | Classifieds | Arcade |
|
|||||||
| Fly Rods Post any comments or questions regarding fly rods... |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Long Rods and Woody Overgrowth
This is pretty much my final question before I plunk down the bucks on my first fly outfit.
If I am fishing in a small river that runs through a Michigan jungle (quite literally - I don't know how to better describe a river that has been swallowed by trees and brush), am I going to regret going with the highly-recommended 9 foot rod? Mind you, I currently spin fish with a 10.5' noodle rod and, while it is a pain in the butt sometimes, it certainly gets the job done. Since fly fishing is a different animal than spin fishing, I am hesitant here. Maybe my goal of covering my needs with 2 rigs will turn into three (maybe a buttery 7 foot 4wt for the jungle fishing)? I think that I've answered my own question but would like confirmation from the ever-so-helpful residents here (seriously - very helpful - thanks). Is the length of the rod a huge concern even after one develops some precision into their casting skill? Mind you, I certainly expect to leverage multiple rigs in the future, as needed - I'm just trying to work that dreaded bang-buck equation into my initial purchase so that I can get some broad exposure to the sport in order to better make my own decisions in the future. |
|
|||
|
Re: Long Rods and Woody Overgrowth
Quote:
Again - appreciate the comments. If the gear wasn't so dag-blasted beautiful in-and-of itself, this would be easy. But some of this stuff is pretty enough to hang in a museum. And that is a really seductive from a financial perspective. |
|
||||
|
Re: Long Rods and Woody Overgrowth
Well, in your shoes, a 8'6" rod might be more ideal. I was just getting at the idea that a 7' rod is not always the way to go.
__________________
Forum Moderator "Through fishing and hunting, we are confronted with the fact that we are part of the web of life and the natural world, NOT apart from the natural order of things, as our daily lives may often suggest." Ed Engleman
|
|
|||
|
Re: Long Rods and Woody Overgrowth
I'll agree with Bigcliff on this one as well. I do have a 7'10" rod I use on small streams, but also have another 3wt that's 8'9" that I use from time to time. Roll casting is so much easier with a longer rod. Last summer, our guide took my 8'6" 5 wt away from me and had me use Debbie's 7' 4wt so she would have an easier time. Made all the difference in the world for her! Besides, if you're like the rest of us, you'll soon have more than one of those "purty" rods. I haven't really seen a rod that I haven't liked. There's some real beauties out there!
Phil |
|
|||
|
Re: Long Rods and Woody Overgrowth
Quote:
Are there meetings that I can attend? |
|
||||
|
Re: Long Rods and Woody Overgrowth
A lot of years ago I got on a short rod "kick" when fishing some of the tight overgrown freestoners in western Pa. I found myself casting with my arm straight up almost---making the rod 2 ft longer and my arm being the butt section of the rod. The shortest rod I own now is an orvis far and fine that is 7'9". That is the rod I would take on an overgrown stream.
I find it a pain to work a long rod in some of the overgrown streams.
__________________
"something is happening here but i dont know what it is"---dylan |
|
|||
|
Re: Long Rods and Woody Overgrowth
Many of the guides in the Smokies find an 8' 4 weight is about perfect for most inexperienced anglers on small streams. I use a 6'6" fiberglass a lot on smaller water like the N. Branch of the Ausable, but I've been doing it for a while. You'll definitely do more flipping, dabbing, and dropping then casting on most small steams. I wouldn't go larger then an 8'6" though, you have to carry it through the woods to get to your small stream too.
__________________
MW Cortland rep |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|