![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
||
|
Welcome to the North American Fly Fishing Forum, the premier discussion group and information source for fly fishing North America. Our experienced membership can answer your questions and make your fly fishing adventures successful. You are currently viewing as a guest which gives you limited access to some features. By joining this forum you will have full access to all special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so Join now and we'll send you some FREE stuff.
* FREE Casting Book "Excerpts: Cast Like a Pro" * FREE Forum Fly Shop $10 Discount Voucher Join now and you'll also get $10 off any $50 purchase at the Forum Fly Shop. Get the gear you need and save money too. |
| Forum Portal | Blogs | Articles | Gear Reviews | Fly Tyer's Round Table | Back at the Lodge | Classifieds | Arcade |
|
|||||||
| Other Gear All other fly fishing gear, tools and gadgets... |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Question on Line Weight
Again - being quite new to this - more questions.
I would be interested in comments indicating what to consider when selecting line weight for my existing 7/8 weight rod and a new 4/5 weight rod taht I am considerring. With the dual designation, I am somewhat unclear what choice to make and what to consider in making it. In both cases I am planning to get a floating WF line and have seen many good suggestions on quality and vendors to consider. Just not sure on weight selection. Thanks Larry |
|
|||
|
Re: Question on Line Weight
Quote:
can you try out before you buy if not would agree heavier if you are casting under 50 feet of fly line |
|
||||
|
Re: Question on Line Weight
I agree with Bonefish, see if you can cast the 2 lines for each rod, most fly shops will have a few reels loaded with various wts and tapers.
The heavier the line, the better the rod will load, but you also need to look at the action of the rod, a faster action rod will handle the heavier line easier than a softer action rod generally. I would also suggest trying different line tapers, I've found that newbies have an easier time casting a w/f line than a d/t, nothing against a d/t line as it has a time and place, but the w/f line seems a bit easier when teaching someone to cast. J. |
|
||||
|
Re: Question on Line Weight
I agree with those above: start out with a WF line an the heavier of the two indicated line weights.
I consider the Cortland 333 lines the starting point for what I call "decent" fly lines. $30+ may seem pricey for "fishin strang", but having a quality line really is quite important. Other brands worth considering are Airflo, Scientific Anglers, Rio, and Orvis. Best value line for a Beginner: Scientific Anglers Mastery Series Headstart Fly Line at L.L.Bean
__________________
Forum Moderator "Through fishing and hunting, we are confronted with the fact that we are part of the web of life and the natural world, NOT apart from the natural order of things, as our daily lives may often suggest." Ed Engleman
|
|
||||
|
Re: Question on Line Weight
Not meaning to hi-jack the thread but I have seen a few people mention "Airflow" lines, I used them years ago but have not seen them in this area for a long time, thought maybe they went under or something, maybe I'm just in the wrong shop.
Are they still made in England?
__________________
"The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts his tactics" "The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite." -- Thomas Jefferson |
|
||||
|
Re: Question on Line Weight
Pretty sure they are still made in the UK. They're kinda hard to find, but I'm a fan. Still need to get one of their ridge lines to try out.
__________________
Forum Moderator "Through fishing and hunting, we are confronted with the fact that we are part of the web of life and the natural world, NOT apart from the natural order of things, as our daily lives may often suggest." Ed Engleman
|
|
|||
|
Re: Question on Line Weight
Well - took some action on this this week. I finally purchased a 5 wt. rod (TFO signature series - 4 piece - 9'). As I see it as my go to dry fly rod, I did want to put good line on it. I chose the Rio Selective Trout - hopefully it will be a good choice.
As for my 7/8 wt. rod, although, I did not purchase anything yet, thanks to the input I will be getting an 8 weight, but will probably stay with something a little less price, Mainstream, or 333 or ??? Thanks for all the input. |
|
|||
|
Re: Question on Line Weight
The rule of thumb to buy the heavier line for a rod with two designated sizes is because a novice fly fisher often has an uncertain feel for the way a rod and line feel when being cast. The heavier line makes itself felt more definitely. Later, after more experience, fly casters often prefer a lighter line as their sense of touch has developed.
If the rod/reel combo is chosen to emphasize delicacy over power, that may well tip the choice (for a dual line-weight rod) toward the lighter line; for a heavier power rod, the default choice should go toward the heavier line: a 9-weight line for an 8/9 rod. Airflo lines (drop the w) have a respectable share of the U.S. market. They are quite competitive in the spey line arena. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MUCILIN | dougm | General Discussion | 11 | 06-04-2007 05:56 PM |
| A Product Update - Cortland’s 444SL Precision Tapers | Fish Bones | Gear Reviews | 0 | 05-01-2005 05:32 PM |
| Overlining? | BigCliff | Fly Rods | 13 | 04-22-2005 10:26 PM |
| The Shooters Revisited—Part 2 | dougm | Everything Else | 0 | 03-26-2005 02:44 PM |
| Cortland's 444SL Precision Tapers | dougm | Gear Reviews | 0 | 03-20-2005 04:48 PM |