The North American Fly Fishing Forum


Go Back   The North American Fly Fishing Forum > Tackle Talk > Fly Rods

Fly Rods Post any comments or questions regarding fly rods...

Like Tree4Likes
  • 2 Post By moucheur2003
  • 1 Post By boomslang
  • 1 Post By sweetandsalt

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2013, 07:08 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 125
jastrout is on a distinguished road
Default H2 vs H 8'6" mid flex 5 weight

I have the Helios and felt it was incredible 5 weight but my friendly shop owner is romancing me the new H 2 version. But he does not have one yet in stock Since there are few models out has anyone even casted the H2 in this model? My opinion the average caster( which I am at best) may be limited to tell difference?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2013, 07:43 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Boston, Mass.
Posts: 1,032
moucheur2003 is a jewel in the roughmoucheur2003 is a jewel in the roughmoucheur2003 is a jewel in the roughmoucheur2003 is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: H2 vs H 8'6" mid flex 5 weight

I have cast the H2 and was really impressed. My comments here: Helios 2 vs Zenith

Didn't compare it to the original Helios so I can't tell you whether the upgrade would be worthwhile. If I were in your position and already had an 8' 6" 5 wt rod I loved, but wanted to get a new one, I would think about supplementing it rather than replacing it. Maybe a 9' 6 wt for distance, or a 7' 6" 3 or 4 wt for small streams.
mcnerney and runningfish like this.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2013, 09:27 AM
fly_guy12955's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: southwest , Virginia
Posts: 1,868
fly_guy12955 is a splendid one to beholdfly_guy12955 is a splendid one to beholdfly_guy12955 is a splendid one to beholdfly_guy12955 is a splendid one to beholdfly_guy12955 is a splendid one to beholdfly_guy12955 is a splendid one to beholdfly_guy12955 is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: H2 vs H 8'6" mid flex 5 weight

Saying you might not be able to enjoy an advanced rod is akin to saying you can not appreciate a luxury car ride because you are a younger driver.

Go for the H2. I am sure it's a super super rod.
__________________
All the romance of trout fishing exists in the mind of the angler and is in no way shared by the fish.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2013, 09:37 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 140
boomslang is on a distinguished road
Default Re: H2 vs H 8'6" mid flex 5 weight

Apparently, orvis and other rod manufacturers figured out that by changing some number and acronyms you can sale more rods. that is why a perfectly good rod gets discontinued and then gets slapped with a different version number or acronyms. it cost more and does not do any thing better. Although, the claims that the new version cast 12.5% farther and weighs 7.9% less has some sort of placebo effect on people with deep pocket.

In my opinion most modern rods are over engineered and way surpasses the casters abilities. I wish I could get a boomslang 2.0 for a caster for the bamboo rod that I bought 15 years ago. I would probably get 30% more distance and about 50% less weight.

in other words. Don't worry about getting the H2. Orvis did not invent any miracle between 2010 and 2013. may be a few of their employees need a bump in their salary package.
rockriver likes this.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2013, 12:13 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 125
jastrout is on a distinguished road
Default Re: H2 vs H 8'6" mid flex 5 weight

Boomslang , You basically had the smarts to say what I was thinking but was being sucked into smooth sales pitch. It is America home of the newest and latest. Thanks well spoken.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2013, 09:58 AM
sweetandsalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: -
Posts: 2,698
sweetandsalt has a brilliant futuresweetandsalt has a brilliant futuresweetandsalt has a brilliant futuresweetandsalt has a brilliant futuresweetandsalt has a brilliant futuresweetandsalt has a brilliant futuresweetandsalt has a brilliant futuresweetandsalt has a brilliant futuresweetandsalt has a brilliant futuresweetandsalt has a brilliant futuresweetandsalt has a brilliant future
Default Re: H2 vs H 8'6" mid flex 5 weight

I do not own any Helios rods but have cast a bunch and fished with four; #5, 6, 8 & 9. The reason Orvis introduced H2 is not entirely for the sales pitch or newness...there were issues with original Helios largely having to do with inadequate lower taper reserve power (or power at all!). H2 introduces a totally new staff member for the Orvis rod team who was brought in to analyze and correct taper design issues pointed out by not only many of us in this forum but by G. Anderson in his Shootouts as well. Having said this, the 8 1/2'/#'s 4 & 5 were "sweet spots" in original H so I would not dispose of this rod especially as you said you think it works great for you. Can't blame your salesman for wanting to sell you a new one and go for it, not as replacement but to supplement what you have. I test cast both mid and tip-flex 9'/#5's and (not reading the writing on the blank as I switched off with a friend) slightly preferred the tip-flex. My favorite of the ones I cast was, surprisingly, the #8...a particular weak spot in H but way better in H2. True, I am a rod aficionado, but there really are design and material advancements that warrant the introduction of new rod series and, if the company makes money in the process, good for them! Take a look at the 8 1/2' or 9'/#4 in H2.
shotgunfly likes this.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2013, 12:17 PM
runningfish's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alberta and California
Posts: 1,227
runningfish is a glorious beacon of lightrunningfish is a glorious beacon of lightrunningfish is a glorious beacon of lightrunningfish is a glorious beacon of lightrunningfish is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: H2 vs H 8'6" mid flex 5 weight

I have the Helios 905-4 midflex and it is my gem. However, would never thought about getting another 5wt in any brands especially the H2 905-4. I could make my H1 to H2 just by printing an H2 sticker from my printer.

Like moucheur2003 said, I would supplement what I have with what I need.
__________________
Bruce White "Fish are friends, not food"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Orvis Helios Zero Gravity 2.0oz Fly Rod 8'4" 2 weight line, Mid Flex 6.5, NEW Ebay Canada Fly Rods for sale 0 04-25-2012 06:50 PM
Orvis TLS Tip Flex 9.5 9' #8 Weight 2pc Fly Fishing Rod Ebay USA Fly Rods for sale 0 12-15-2011 08:40 PM
Orvis 9', 4-weight, 3 1/8oz, Tip Flex 9.5 Fly Fishing Rod Ebay USA Fly Rods for sale 0 12-11-2011 10:10 PM
Orvis Trident TLS 8'4" 2 weight 2 Piece Fly Rod - Mid Flex -Excellent Condition! Ebay Canada Fly Rods for sale 0 09-22-2011 03:10 PM
Line for ZG Helios 10' 9.5 Tip Flex 4-weight rod Fly2Fish Fly Lines 5 08-10-2009 04:27 PM













All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
2005-2014 The North American Fly Fishing Forum. All rights reserved.