The North American Fly Fishing Forum


Go Back   The North American Fly Fishing Forum > Tackle Talk > Fly Rods

Fly Rods Post any comments or questions regarding fly rods...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2008, 09:18 PM
GRN's Avatar
GRN GRN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 287
GRN will become famous soon enough
Default Re: beginning rod vs. intermediate, advanced

Quote:
Originally Posted by burk48237 View Post
It's funny that one of the posters mentioned the Sage 590 RPL, I traded mine for a Winston WT 865. And I couldn't believe the improvement in my trout fishing. The 590, handled IMO almost like a 7 weight (I could throw bass bugs with it).
Burk, sounds a lot more like an RPL+ which are probably the most famous graphite rods made for being over lined, the RPL/VPS blank is pretty true to spec. In my experience... have had 3 of both.
__________________
... But a lifelong journey.

I choose fly rods the same way I do women, motorcycles, and cowboy boots...
go with what ever feels good, and keep on hand as many as I can afford
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 03-02-2008, 10:18 PM
BigCliff's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Texas
Posts: 4,313
BigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant future
Default Re: beginning rod vs. intermediate, advanced

Lots of good info here. I'll agree that a beginner is best off starting out with a medium-slow to medium-fast rod, and that a beginner does not have to start out with a cheaper rod. A Sage ZXL or Winston LT would be a perfectly good beginner rod, if said beginner has the budget for it.

One other thing I'd like to point out is that most rods under $100 ARE NOT good beginner rods, because they are often heavy, floppy, don't dampen well, etc. Trying to learn the sport with a frustrating rod is not fun. I generally recommend the ECHO classic 9' 5wt for beginners because its a good medium-ish action rod that behaves well for all casters and is an excellent value with a great warranty.
__________________
http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-..._1276302_n.jpg

I'd rather hunt fish than bait deer any day.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2008, 05:47 PM
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2
randyk is on a distinguished road
Default Re: beginning rod vs. intermediate, advanced

Bigcliff,

I was considering both the Echo and a TFO Professional series, both 9ft. 5 wt. How do these two compare? Their prices are the same. I don't have any fly shops in my area and have to do my purchases by mail.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2008, 07:18 PM
Joni's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,575
Joni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: beginning rod vs. intermediate, advanced

I am going to GUESS cause I have only cast the ECHO 2, that the ECHO is a faster rod. I have the Pro and it is a medium action, the Echo 2 was more a medium fast.
Sixes on the two.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2008, 09:03 PM
BigCliff's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Texas
Posts: 4,313
BigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant futureBigCliff has a brilliant future
Default Re: beginning rod vs. intermediate, advanced

The ECHO Classic is a touch slower than the TFO pro to my experience. Well, not so much noticeably slower as smoother. The TFO Pro rods have a bit higher flex point than the ECHO, but I think the two rods are very similar in power and line speed generation.

I'm not totally sure, but I think the ECHO will be a little lighter than the TFO. Though coming up short in the lightness battle, the TFO might be slightly tougher than the ECHO.

I'd say if a lighter, smoother, glossy green rod that comes with a tube appeals- go for the ECHO.

If punchy, tough, and matte black sounds more your speed- TFO wins the day.

Best option- order both from fly fishing - fly fishing gear, cast them both, and send back the one you like less. He's got a 14 day test-drive program.
__________________
http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-..._1276302_n.jpg

I'd rather hunt fish than bait deer any day.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 08:25 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14
brokeONE is on a distinguished road
Default Re: beginning rod vs. intermediate, advanced

This is a good post for me, because I'm getting ready to buy my first fly rod. I have decided to go ahead and get a rod thats around the 400 dollar range. Just so I won't be upgrading it in a year.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 10:38 AM
FrankB2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,760
FrankB2 has a reputation beyond reputeFrankB2 has a reputation beyond reputeFrankB2 has a reputation beyond reputeFrankB2 has a reputation beyond reputeFrankB2 has a reputation beyond reputeFrankB2 has a reputation beyond reputeFrankB2 has a reputation beyond reputeFrankB2 has a reputation beyond reputeFrankB2 has a reputation beyond reputeFrankB2 has a reputation beyond reputeFrankB2 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: beginning rod vs. intermediate, advanced

Quote:
Originally Posted by brokeONE View Post
This is a good post for me, because I'm getting ready to buy my first fly rod. I have decided to go ahead and get a rod thats around the 400 dollar range. Just so I won't be upgrading it in a year.
Upgrading: It might not be an issue of upgrading, but you might change
your preference in the not to distant future. As people learn how to cast,
develop a sense of what they need in terms of length on their favorite
waters, etc, a new rod is not unlikely . Some start out with a 9' 5wt,
and a year later they're fishing a 7'6" 4wt. $400 will buy two very nice
rods that will cover a wider range of conditions than a single rod. An 8' 4wt,
along with a 9' 6wt will allow you to fish small streams with and large rivers.
Just my $.02 .

P.S. Cliff seems pretty impressed with the Echo line of rods, and I have little reason to doubt his enthusiasm. I don't have any
experience with them myself, but have cast the TFO Pro rods. They're nothing to sneeze at, and an excellent value for $150.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 11:29 AM
Joni's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,575
Joni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond reputeJoni has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: beginning rod vs. intermediate, advanced

Very good point Frank B. That is great advise. 4 and 6 would just about cover everything we have around here, in fact that is what I started out doing.
2 wt, 4 wt, 6 wt, and an 8 wt (for rare occasions)
The 2wt could be done with out, but a deal I couldn't pass on and is a fun stick on high mountain strams.
I later added the odd number sizes, but also as Frank B said, after awhile you get to a point where you know what will work.
9' is a given, but then I found places I wanted a 7' TO 9' SO AGAIN I FILLED IN THE GAP.
Now I got the short sticks covered, I am looking at 10'+, but I am a fly fish a holic and not looking for a cure anytime soon. ;-)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hello from Idaho Panhandle lbsid Member Introductions 6 11-13-2007 10:30 AM
Northern Indiana flyfishing Hawksglen General Discussion 5 02-22-2007 08:30 PM
fly rod cortland(thanks steve) freeze69 The Lodge Den 11 08-25-2005 02:39 PM













All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
2005-2014 The North American Fly Fishing Forum. All rights reserved.