The North American Fly Fishing Forum


Go Back   The North American Fly Fishing Forum > News and Announcements > News & articles for discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2011, 09:01 AM
Editor
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,085
Editor is a jewel in the roughEditor is a jewel in the roughEditor is a jewel in the roughEditor is a jewel in the rough
Default AFFTA Stands Against Montana's HB309

This is a dedicated thread for discussing article: AFFTA Stands Against Montana's HB309
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2011, 09:06 AM
Frank Whiton's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,301
Frank Whiton has a reputation beyond reputeFrank Whiton has a reputation beyond reputeFrank Whiton has a reputation beyond reputeFrank Whiton has a reputation beyond reputeFrank Whiton has a reputation beyond reputeFrank Whiton has a reputation beyond reputeFrank Whiton has a reputation beyond reputeFrank Whiton has a reputation beyond reputeFrank Whiton has a reputation beyond reputeFrank Whiton has a reputation beyond reputeFrank Whiton has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Skype™ to Frank Whiton
Default Re: AFFTA Stands Against Montana's HB309

Hi Everyone,

This story just touches on the fight going on in Montana right now. Even though the Montana State Supreme Court has already ruled that the public has access to Montana's streams, land owners are trying to get around the ruling. Utah fought a similar law and lost the battle at least temporally. State trespass laws effect everyone who fishes in that particular state no matter where you live.

Frank
__________________
Click the image to open in full size.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2011, 10:28 AM
Glen Wright's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA.
Posts: 971
Glen Wright is just really niceGlen Wright is just really niceGlen Wright is just really niceGlen Wright is just really nice
Default Re: AFFTA Stands Against Montana's HB309

I just really have a problem with anyone should be able to restrict access to a natural accuring stream or river regardless whether it is navigable or if crosses through private property. I simply do not beleive any individual can own such a property and therefore has no right to restrict access. I beleive that there should be a public right of way area anywhere there is a natural water course and not only on the water itself. However I do not believe any land owner with property butting up to whatever the public area is should be required to be responsible for the up keep of that public right of way area. So in my opinion the defeat of this law is absolutely critical and its passing would IMO be a violation of all of our rights as U.S. citizens. Let me say as a former agricultural land owner I believe rights of land owners and the right to own and control private property, but I also beleive there should be some limits to those rights such as I describe above.
__________________
-Tom Wilson
Attention New Fly Fishers and those just wanting to improve- Join a Fly Fishing Club. They have classes on every aspect of fly fishing for beginners to advanced for free or cheaper than offered elsewhere. Some offer mentor programs. You will make friends with other fly fishers. Clubs often have outings in which members pay special group rates for guides or to fish prime private access areas.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2011, 05:34 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6
dogfly is on a distinguished road
Default Re: AFFTA Stands Against Montana's HB309

I agree that streams should be open to everyone. If it was born and died on that personís property then we have to ask. We should be able to walk and wade the stream from a public access point.
I have a trout stream in my back yard. Normally one asks permission to fish it. However if there is a fisherman on the stream, I donít care if he stays there all day as long as he does not mess up the place. Trout normally come up to my property only when there is lots of water after a good rain Ė saw a nice brown yesterday.
Then there are (less than 1%) who donít care about the stream nor property. They leave the place a mess; even throw garbage into the stream. If it continues Iíll close it down to all just for a few lousy dopes. Then they think that my property is an access point without asking. If someone gets hurt, itís pretty rocky going down to the stream, theyíll end up suing me, I DONĒT NEED THAT.
Laws have to change to protect the property owner from liability and have a special stamp to catch lawyers (no catch and release), in addition to a trout stamp
I believe that we all should have access. Again itís the liability that gets in the way.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Murphy runs for AFFTA Editor News & articles for discussion 1 08-15-2010 04:30 PM
Berlin shifts role to Business Manager at AFFTA Editor News & articles for discussion 1 02-02-2010 07:22 AM
AFFTA announces new show and new Marketing Director Editor News & articles for discussion 0 12-21-2009 05:44 AM
Montana montanadryfly Find a Fishing Partner 1 07-30-2008 02:05 PM
"Montana on the Fly" guidebook has information on fly fishing Montana rivers, lodging Fish Bones The Daily Papers 0 06-12-2008 01:40 AM













All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
2005-2014 The North American Fly Fishing Forum. All rights reserved.