The North American Fly Fishing Forum


Go Back   The North American Fly Fishing Forum > News and Announcements > News & articles for discussion

Like Tree5Likes
  • 1 Post By king joe
  • 3 Post By littledavid123
  • 1 Post By king joe

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2014, 07:47 AM
Editor
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,176
Editor is a jewel in the roughEditor is a jewel in the roughEditor is a jewel in the roughEditor is a jewel in the rough
Default Small is Important

New article posted on theflyfishingforum.com: Small is Important
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2014, 08:23 AM
plecain's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 910
plecain is a glorious beacon of lightplecain is a glorious beacon of lightplecain is a glorious beacon of lightplecain is a glorious beacon of lightplecain is a glorious beacon of lightplecain is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Small is Important

I think TU might want to rethink this one.

The proposed rule seems to go a lot further than the article says. From my reading of it, it looks like it could be used by some overzealous bureaucrat, or some of the more extreme 'environmental' groups, to file lawsuits regulating, at the federal level, things as small as spring runoff puddles in your own back yard.

I'm a TU member, but don't always agree with its support for some things.
__________________
Objects in the rear view mirror may appear closer than they are.
--Paul
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2014, 11:38 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Strathroy, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 195
king joe will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Small is Important

Whoa....where to start with this one? Its like deja vu all over again. Sometimes I look at the states and think...wow, you guys got it right. THEN...others, I go...look to the north to see what we are doing...or in this case relative to the TU proposal...what we did wrong.

In Canada, we have a piece of legislation that is called the Federal Fisheries Act. This Act...protects fish and fish habitat...and habitat is loosely defined as 'needed for feeding, shelter and reproduction...and all the corridors (streams) connecting them'...and I paraphrase when I say that. The act also brings into play....direct and indirect fish habitat. Direct being...well, fish actively use 'this' feature while indirect could be many things such as 'just' a water contributer to a food source (i.e. creek banks)...to a range of things that could be waterborne or end up in the water.

While this act has been around since the 1800's, it did not undergo any re-writes until recently..and not in a good way. That said, the act was only selectively deployed across Canada being most used for Marine fisheries more than anything. Late 1996, the provinces whom were 'doing' the act, pushed the act back to the Feds and then, the act was started to be more applied.

At first, many thought like you did Plecain...'even a pond could be fish habitat'.....but that didn't happen. Logic always still applies....and 'zealous bureaucrats' are fewer than logical scientists/biologists....not that that always matters....I concede.

In Ontario, there is also a wonderous piece of legislation called the Drainage Act....which basically is the empowerment of the province to create waterways...or alter existing waterways to suit agricultural needs. This INCLUDES enclosing 'those pesky small creeks' as needed because there in the way of development.

The Fisheries Act should have protected these smaller...and in many cases, indirect fish habitats and because Fed Law supercedes Prov law, there shouldn't be an issue...but it didn't....and here is where the re-write mentioned above came in. Despite science effectively proving the value of small and intermittent streams...development won the day....and proving impacts became harder for biologist whom ALSO had budget/staff cuts (nice 1-2 punch by the fed government).

There is so much more to say on this and this could easily be a complete dissertation on Biology vs. Legislature... but suffice to say....GET BEHIND the TU work now before its too late. They have experience in this on both sides of the border...and know what they do (despite the Plan having only one picture of what could be construed as a head water stream). The alternative to what they are suggesting....is pavement or creeks in tubes/pipes UNDER pavement.

By the way...I am not a TU member...and never have been. I have worked with TU on projects, yes...and sat across the table from them as I reviewed projects they proposed (as a Fed regulator). I know well...I think...both sides of the story...and I'd rather be on the side of caution...than EVER on the side of development.

Always keep in mind...and I have said this 1000 times to developers or agriculture or...or...or...on the side of streams...."waterways are not inconveniences that you need to solve".

Just sayin' is all.

King Joe Outa Here!
shotgunfly likes this.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2014, 05:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,394
littledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Small is Important

I am in support of the Congress taking this power away from the EPA because ultimately the EPA will be deciding who can and can't graze cattle, raise a garden or even mow your grass because it may affect the quality of run-off water (intermittent stream). Worst case these decisions should be left to the states to decide as the EPA no longer has the citizens best interest at heart.

Dave
__________________
...You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer... Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2014, 11:00 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Strathroy, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 195
king joe will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Small is Important

Would it be that simple....so pastoral...so innocent and all Kumbaya...I'd agree. BUT it typically is not. This is known as the Tragedy of the Commons. WE feel the right to do what we want with the resources near us...and be damned the consequences downstream, downwind or even around the corner.

Is it a right to put a feedlot and basically a beef-plantation on a headwater stream?

Is it a right to graze cattle in creeks?

Is it a right to mow your lawn...to the waters edge because them pesky reeds just don't look right?

Is it a right to plant a garden in a floodplain because dang, that dark soil grows great tomatoes.

I suppose I should have asked all of the above like this instead "Is IT right to..." ....because really, all the above IS a right. Ya know what they say...give an inch and they'll take a stream...i mean...mile....a mile of stream...wait, what?

I like to believe the majority of people will do the right thing...but too many times...I've seen contrary....and ONE 'I didn't think it would matter'...is the Exxon Valdez. Its the uncappable underwater well head off the west coast. Its California San Francisco Bay (love the neon green and red inland bays), its the farmer that dumps his pig manure into a creek because, well, the solution to pollution is dilution.....its...its...its.

I'm just saying...been der, don dat here in Canada. The Tragedy of the Commons rules here and we are perhaps blessed with lots of good waters and woods. THis does not...never does...mean, we take it lightly or for granted. Legislation....is needed...smart legislation....and no legislation...as I already said....the alternative is pavement.

King Joe Outa Here!
shotgunfly likes this.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2014, 05:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,394
littledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond reputelittledavid123 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Small is Important

Yeah right, and climate change, global warming or global cooling (not sure what the current politically correct name is) is based upon honest, non-manipulated facts!

Obama EPA Chief: Pollution is Racist



Dave
__________________
...You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer... Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2014, 05:52 PM
Liphookedau's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,738
Liphookedau has much to be proud ofLiphookedau has much to be proud ofLiphookedau has much to be proud ofLiphookedau has much to be proud ofLiphookedau has much to be proud ofLiphookedau has much to be proud ofLiphookedau has much to be proud ofLiphookedau has much to be proud of
Default Re: Small is Important

I agree with King Joe also as it's up to us all to keep watch on what's happening as The Small Feeder Streams are also The Start & Part of all The River Systems to Keep The Waters Clean & The Areas always Pristine.
There are always laws made & passed however from time to time they are broken as there's cracks in The legislation which protect some from being prosecuted.
A typical example is about 10-15 miles from here where Mining Companies literally removed The Mountainsides thus removing all The Vegetation like what happened in Idaho with The Hydrauliking years ago whereas if I cut a tree down in my backyard without approval I can be Fined,double standards ???
Brian
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is the MOST important aspect of a fly? busbus General Fly Tying Discussions 24 12-31-2013 07:46 AM
Rod weight.. really that important? petee Fly Rods 34 12-17-2013 10:04 AM
New or Used - Is the warranty important alfordjo Fly Rods 10 08-26-2013 03:46 PM
How important is a reel? greenfish4 General Discussion 14 02-01-2012 09:04 AM
Important Rod question... wlb06 General Discussion 7 05-26-2008 08:16 PM













All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
2005-2014 The North American Fly Fishing Forum. All rights reserved.