Home | Fly Fishing Features | News | Alaskan Red Gold still under threat from UK mining company

Alaskan Red Gold still under threat from UK mining company

By
Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
Sockeye on the Funnel, Katmai National Park. Photo by Ben Knight Sockeye on the Funnel, Katmai National Park. Photo by Ben Knight

Anglo American Plc promised not to build the controversial Pebble Mine if local Alaskan residents are against it. Today, a large majority of them are yet still the proposals move forward.

ANCHORAGE, Alaska – Alaskan political, business, and community leaders on Earth Day will challenge Anglo American to explain why it continues to spend millions on a mining project despite fierce local opposition and its own CEO's public promise to "not go where communities are against us."

The group will confront the company’s executives and shareholders at Anglo American’s annual meeting in London on April 22. Follow their story online at ourbristolbay.com, Twitter and Facebook.

redgold_424323383.jpgThe strong local opposition is based on Anglo American and its Canadian partner's plans to build the proposed Pebble Mine in the headwaters of Alaska's Bristol Bay – spawning habitat for the most valuable wild sockeye salmon runs on Earth. The wild salmon are a major source of jobs and revenue, and the heart of local Native cultures.

Their stiffening opposition, unusual in the pro-development state, against what could be one of the world's largest open pit mines has garnered significant international support, including major jewelry retailers like Zales and Tiffany & Co, as well as large class ring manufacturers.

Anglo American officials, who already have spent $323 million on the mine project and who will spend millions more on it this year, have promised that such strong local disapproval would lead them to not continue with its development of the Pebble Mine.

In an interview last year, Anglo American CEO Cynthia Carroll promised “if I’m not satisfied we can proceed without harm to the local people and the environment, then we simply won’t do it."

akuk_257868210.jpg“We will not go where communities are against us,” she has said.

Carroll’s statements echoed a promise she and a former Anglo American board chairman gave to Alaskans in April of last year.
“When we met with CEO Cynthia Carroll and former board chairman Sir Mark Moody, they told us Anglo American would not develop Pebble Mine if local people did not want it,” said Bobby Andrew, who attended the meeting in London. Andrew is a spokesman for Nunamta Aulukestai, a Native organization representing eight tribal villages in Bristol Bay.

In September, a poll revealed that most Alaska Natives who live in Bristol Bay are opposed to the proposed Pebble project. The poll results came just a few months before a regional corporation, which controls large land holdings surrounding the proposed mine and represents local Native residents, passed a resolution opposing the Pebble Mine.

“Why are we ignored?” Andrew asked. “The vast majority of local residents refuse to give up our wild salmon to make mining companies rich.”
Despite the obvious risks and the fierce local opposition to the mine, Anglo American and its partners are forging ahead with the mine proposal.
Permit applications for the Pebble Mine could be filed as early as next year. With gold selling at record highs of up to $1,200 an ounce the incentive for the mining giant to forge ahead is greater than ever.

NoPebbleMine_173508230.jpgHowever, the company has suffered financial setbacks because of the economic recession in the U.S. and Europe. Securing billions of dollars in capital in a tight credit market is increasingly difficult. And additional challenges are mounting:

  • Politically significant commercial and sport fishing industries oppose the mine.
  • Alaska lawmakers are considering tightening the state’s mine permitting rules.
  • Anglo American has been fined for repeated water use violations.
  • The U.S. Department of the Interior recently withdrew its consideration Bristol Bay for offshore oil and gas drilling, calling the bay “a national treasure.”  Agency officials also could bar mining on lands it manages near the Pebble deposit.
  • Legal challenges are piling up.
  • And an investor advisory released last year by mine opponents detailed a long list of potential risks.






Articles by the same author






Comments (2 posted):

Editor on 16/04/2010 10:28:23
avatar
The Pebble Mine saga continues and comes to the UK next week for a second round of meetings with the UK based mining bosses. Let's hope they stay true to their words but their actions say otherwise currently.
Frank Whiton on 16/04/2010 12:20:39
avatar
Hi Everyone, I posted a map of the area that will be impacted by the Pebble Creek mining. The Red areas show the immediate mining areas with claims. This could impact the majority of the waters on the West and South sides of Iliamna Lake. This may be the single best Trout/Salmon fishing in the Northern Hemisphere. Talarik ckeek has some huge Rainbows that is easy to access. A lot of the lodges with planes visit here frequently. The Nushagak has a Hugh run of Kings every year. You can see on the map that the Mulchatna or Nushagak could be contaminated very easily. You can see one of the red areas sits on a river that feeds the Kvichak river. This river has millions of Red Salmon every year. The Kvichak is a BIG Rainbow heaven. Many 30"+ Rainbows are caught every year. Many of the millions of Salmon passing into Lake Iliamna via the Kvichak River also feed up into the Lake Clark area. Not to mention all the other rivers feeding into Lake Iliamna. Then when you look at the mustard colored areas that show potential additional areas that may be mined. The only area safe from mining is Katmai Park and Preserve. Protecting the Park would not help the fish much if the lower rivers are contaminated. Some people are claiming that all of this concern is misplaced and no rivers are going to be destroyed. I lived in Alaska and the mining industry is continually in trouble with water pollution problems. Their one thought is to get the gold and so what if a few fish are killed. The Pebble Creek mine has already had several water violations just getting ready to begin mining. It is a lot easier and cheaper for them to do what they want and then pay a fine. Don't think for a minute that they don't balance fines against cost to make decisions. I love Alaska and went through the construction of the Alyeska Oil Pipeline. I remember my first trip down from Pump Station 4 to Fairbanks in a Helicopter. When we crested out of the Brooks Range I could see the pipe laid out in front of me going through a beautiful valley. I thought to my self, "my god, what have we done." The pipeline had so much regulation and control that it will be a walk in the park compared to what is going to happen with the Pebble Creek mine. The State is mostly in control and it made the mine possible. I am afraid that the State is too interested in the revenues that will be generated rather than protecting this heaven on Earth country. Frank
Add/View Comments
  • Email to a friend Email to a friend
  • Print version Print version
  • Plain text Plain text

Tagged as:

alaska, salmon, pebble mine

Rate this article

5.00

Follow NA Fly Fishing Forums!