How to Convert the Old Line Weights to Modern AFTMA Line Weights;

Ard

Forum Member
Staff member
Messages
26,191
Reaction score
16,373
Location
Wasilla / Skwentna, Alaska
If you find yourself in possession of a vintage rod and find that there are a series of letters on the butt section but no indication of what line is recommended have a look at the chart below.

8ceee346af03b6dc278d6301687ef20a.jpg

Before the AFTMA system became the standard rods and fly lines alike were labeled with a code. While the code may have been fun and mysterious I think we can agree that it's easier to say I have a 5 weight then saying, Mine is an HEH - HEG, what's yours?
 
Last edited:

fire instructor

Well-known member
Messages
732
Reaction score
8
Location
Upstate NY (Albany Area)
I'm confused.... I have an old 40+ y/o Wonderrod that's listed as using C, D, HDH, HCH, and 8H lines.

According to your chart:

C = 7 level
D = 6 level
HDH = 6 DT
HCH = 7 DT
8H = un-listed....

So I'm thinking I should throw a 6 or 7 WF on it, and give it a shot....
 

Ard

Forum Member
Staff member
Messages
26,191
Reaction score
16,373
Location
Wasilla / Skwentna, Alaska
Hi Rick,

The chart is just one I have had in my browser for a few years. Since this comes up time to time I thought it may serve as a general guideline to sort out line from old to new.

Ard
 

wjc

Well-known member
Messages
2,246
Reaction score
80
Location
south florida
Thanks Ard! Now I know what weight line I was throwing as a kid on my South Bend rod, and why the WF line seemed so heavy.
 
L

Liphookedau

Guest
Rick I think you'll find a #6WF will be Fine,a #5 Rio Grand might even be OK ??
The reason The Early Lines were heavy they became waterlogged.
I remember the HCH or 7 DT Lines very well,from the late 50s,early 60s until The Weight Fowards arrived on the scene as they were all you could buy.
I still have a new HCH Line on a Reel I kept as I was chasing a Hardy's Classic Top of The Range Rod which belonged to a Fishing Mate of my Fathers which I had hoped to purchase & one day use,however now I would probably use a modern DT or even a WF Line instead.
Brian.
 

nickj

Well-known member
Messages
838
Reaction score
21
Location
Mid-coast Maine
Thanks, a useful chart. That said, some of the old lines/weights/rods are somewhat iffy. I have an old Orvis Madison, recommended weight is HGH but throws a 6 weight beautifully.
 

overmywaders

Well-known member
Messages
112
Reaction score
9
That chart, made by SA, may have been accurate years ago for the Scientific Angler lines, but little else.

You can't get from diameters to line weights; there are too many variables.

Think about it, the difference in weight between silk, Nylon, and PVC is tremendous. Then, the silk or Nylon braided line would have been "oil finished". Since different manufacturers used different oil/varnish/resin mixes, there is another weight variable. Tight braid or loose braid?

The taper itself is the greatest factor to consider. Silk, and later Nylon, lines might have up to twelve feet of level line at the tip. Then the front taper might have been four feet or fifteen feet. If it was a WF, the belly might have been six feet or thirty feet. Then you have the "holding line", the back taper, and the running line... all variables.

So, how can HCH translate into a weight? It can't.

"You can't get there from here." :)
 

philip43

Well-known member
Messages
134
Reaction score
3
I purchased an old South Bend steel rod a couple of years age. It is marked HDH, I will put a No. 6, weight forward line on it and try it out. It is marked as being 8'6", but about 4 inches must have been broken off the tip. Thanks for posting the chart. :)
 

Ard

Forum Member
Staff member
Messages
26,191
Reaction score
16,373
Location
Wasilla / Skwentna, Alaska
That chart, made by SA, may have been accurate years ago for the Scientific Angler lines, but little else.

You can't get from diameters to line weights; there are too many variables.

Think about it, the difference in weight between silk, Nylon, and PVC is tremendous. Then, the silk or Nylon braided line would have been "oil finished". Since different manufacturers used different oil/varnish/resin mixes, there is another weight variable. Tight braid or loose braid?

The taper itself is the greatest factor to consider. Silk, and later Nylon, lines might have up to twelve feet of level line at the tip. Then the front taper might have been four feet or fifteen feet. If it was a WF, the belly might have been six feet or thirty feet. Then you have the "holding line", the back taper, and the running line... all variables.

So, how can HCH translate into a weight? It can't.

"You can't get there from here." :)
Here's another conversion table compliments of the Orvis Company. They have a long history bamboo rod manufacturing as well as being one of the first to introduce graphite rods on a large scale to the modern market. Although the calculations may have faults I'm afraid they are what we have.

Silk Fly Line Conversion Chart via Orvis
 
Top