Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: Underwater Cameras

  1. Default Re: Underwater Cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by Jackster View Post
    Is the lens on that Olympus motor driven and does it protrude when you turn it on?
    No, the lense is all internal and fixed. There is a little servo powered lense cover that actuates like a shutter when you power off.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Mike

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Missouri City (near Houston), Texas
    Posts
    1,262

    Default Re: Underwater Cameras

    [QUOTE]
    Quote Originally Posted by Jackster View Post
    . . .I wouldn't forsake good image quality for something that's just a little bit smaller. The bottom line IS the picture, right?
    Well, yes, but that's a false comparison between the Olympus and the Pentax (among a pretty small universe of waterproof - not just water resistant) compact cameras. As I mentioned, the Olympus rated in the Top Five Compact Cameras in at least one review I read, with "good" image production, although anecdotal comments in this thread seem to indicate that the Pentax may have the edge on macros and certain other features (not borne out by the reviews), which extra features may or may not matter to the photographer.

    As someone who has more - and far more expensive - cameras than fly rods from my days as a professional photographer longer ago than I care to admit, I've learned over the years that the bigger the camera's "footprint", the less likely I am to carry it along if it's an adjunct to another activity like fly-fishing. While I've carried expensive non-waterproof cameras along with me on the river, I was so nervous about dropping them in the water that it detracted a good deal from the fun of the trip. And there are plenty of other Posters on this thread who will attest to the ease in dropping a camera in the water, with always-fatal results.

    Bottom line: There's no area more obviously subject to trade-offs than cameras - we all know this: fast lenses with wide apertures = large heavy lenses, etc. With digital, however, even though electronics cannot overcome the deficiency of inferior glass lenses, smaller can be better (but usually at a higher price).

    Just my two cents . . .
    On the whole, I'd rather be in Wyoming . . .
    Fly2:

  3. #33

    Default Re: Underwater Cameras

    [quote=Fly2Fish;17232]
    Well, yes, but that's a false comparison between the Olympus and the Pentax (among a pretty small universe of waterproof - not just water resistant)
    The Pentax W30 is waterproof for up to 2 hours at 10' depth. That should be plenty for all but the hardiest or clumsiest fly fishers.

    As I mentioned, the Olympus rated in the Top Five Compact Cameras in at least one review I read, with "good" image production
    Were all 5 camera's waterproof and was the waterproof Pentax in that test? Apples-for-apples means much more

    As someone who has more - and far more expensive - cameras than fly rods from my days as a professional photographer longer ago than I care to admit
    What was your film camera brand of choice and did you use Olympus then too?

    I've learned over the years that the bigger the camera's "footprint", the less likely I am to carry it along if it's an adjunct to another activity like fly-fishing.
    That's why it's so great both the Pentax and the late-comer to the waterproof/water resistant digital camera scene, Olympus, are so small. Both are really quite comparable to each other in side, especially when compared to dragging an SLR on the water.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Missouri City (near Houston), Texas
    Posts
    1,262

    Default Re: Underwater Cameras

    [QUOTE=Jackster;17238]
    Quote Originally Posted by Fly2Fish View Post
    The Pentax W30 is waterproof for up to 2 hours at 10' depth. That should be plenty for all but the hardiest or clumsiest fly fishers.
    Absolutely right.

    Were all 5 camera's waterproof and was the waterproof Pentax in that test? Apples-for-apples means much more.
    No, the only waterproof camera in that comparison was the Olympus. But all that tells you is that the Olympus rated well in the Compact Camera segment, even among non-waterproof cameras.

    What was your film camera brand of choice and did you use Olympus then too?
    Nope - Nikon was my preference. Never used Olympus.

    That's why it's so great both the Pentax and the late-comer to the waterproof/water resistant digital camera scene, Olympus, are so small. Both are really quite comparable to each other in side, especially when compared to dragging an SLR on the water.
    I couldn't agree more. It's a great time to be picking cameras in the tough world of waterproof/shockproof/etc.
    Jackster, didn't mean to raise your hackles . . . just my opinion, FWIW.
    On the whole, I'd rather be in Wyoming . . .
    Fly2:

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Similar Threads

  1. Also from Colorado
    By stevieb in forum Member Introductions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-06-2007, 03:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •