Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: new umpqua bags

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Broomfield, CO
    Posts
    200

    Default new umpqua bags

    https://umpqua.com/packs-and-bags/


    Front Range anglers got them in yesterday so I stopped by today to check them out and ended up picking up the overlook 500 in green. Man the build quality is amazing and the bag is laid out really well. I cant wait to get my stuff in it and get out on the river to try it out. I highly recommend checking them out when the start shipping them out to more retailers.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Broomfield, Co
    Posts
    3,177
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: new umpqua bags

    I saw FRA advertising them on their newsletter and website. As you use it keep us informed. I've got a Simms headwater hip pack I got at FRA and it is pretty good but would be interested in hearing about other options.
    "The fish you're gonna find up here, you're gonna find; Rainbow,Cuttbow,CuttBrowns,Brownbows,RainBrowns,
    CuttyRainbrowns, Pike ,Perch"

    "Snap it" Hank Patterson

  3. #3

    Default Re: new umpqua bags

    I passed by them for a moment at Cabela's, the Ledges 650 may have to replace my Patagonia Stealth waist pack... It's so crammed right now, I could use a little extra space, especially when I switch to carrying bass bugs in huge boxes.

    I've been so happy with this pack... Until now
    "The finest gift you can give to any fisherman is to put a good fish back, and who knows if the fish that you caught isn't someone else's gift to you?" - Lee Wulff

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Knoxville Tn
    Posts
    369

    Default Re: new umpqua bags

    I just got a Umpqua 500 bag .when I got home I begin loading the bag up with all my normal gear. What I found out was thaT it didn't hold as much gear as I wanted.so I removed all my gear and look at the bag more carefully. The problem is the frame.the frame gives of support which I like about the bag.but was more bent to much toward the storage area of the pack.limiting the amount of gear you can carry. In the back of the bag is zipper that goes no where took me a while to understand what this was for.only thing I could understand this is how you can you can remove the frame .by taking the frame out thru this zipper.so I removed the frame thru the zipper when I removed the frame it allowed more storage area. But lost the support which I liked. So I reshaped the frame so it does not have as much torque to the bag. When I did this the frame became more elongated so I had to compress the length so it would fit back in the bag.after putting the frame back in the bag it retained the support and also increased the gear area. Much better fit for what gear I wanted to carry. I hope this helps others who buys this pack.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Boston, Mass.
    Posts
    2,714

    Default Re: new umpqua bags

    Would the larger 650 pack avoid that problem? Or is it so much bigger that it isn't really practical as a fanny pack?

    (I noticed on the Umpqua page that a lot of the links to the details of the individual models are dead.)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Knoxville Tn
    Posts
    369

    Default Re: new umpqua bags

    Quote Originally Posted by moucheur2003 View Post
    Would the larger 650 pack avoid that problem? Or is it so much bigger that it isn't really practical as a fanny pack?

    (I noticed on the Umpqua page that a lot of the links to the details of the individual models are dead.)
    The 650 pack is to large for me the design is much the same the 650 has 1 more zipper compartment than the 500 allowing more storage . But the frame configuration also limits the amount storage of the 650 . To get the most storage possible the frame needs to be re configured. This can be done by hand .the frame is very rigged with plastic coating over a metal frame.

  7. #7

    Default Re: new umpqua bags

    Thanks for the info, Bill. I was thinking of getting the 650 anyways, as there wouldn't be much difference in my Patagonia stealth and the 500 (roughly 73 cu in), but with the mods you described now I feel like I could probably fit all of my gear and maybe my ultralight rain jacket or lunch in the 650 as well.
    "The finest gift you can give to any fisherman is to put a good fish back, and who knows if the fish that you caught isn't someone else's gift to you?" - Lee Wulff

  8. #8

    Default Re: new umpqua bags

    Sooooo... I had a credit to BPS and they carry these. No-brainier, ordered it. Before taking the tags off, I load all of my gear in it to make sure hat I like it as much as I think I do. Strap it on, great. Then I go to put my water bottles in the side pockets ( my patagonia stealth hip pack will very securely hold two nalgenes) and they are pretty much useless. I would not fully trust a twelve ounce can of beer to stay in there safely. Such a disappointment on what I considered to be one of the best new products out there.

    Deal-breaker. To me, having plenty of water to sustain yourself is an essential up there with sung screen, hat, and shades. I really hope that they'll fix this, because the pack is almost every thing I want it to be.

    If you think something's too good to be true, it probably is. Now I guess I can find something e.se to blow my credit on, that's the good news!
    "The finest gift you can give to any fisherman is to put a good fish back, and who knows if the fish that you caught isn't someone else's gift to you?" - Lee Wulff

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Huffman, TX (Houston Area)
    Posts
    131

    Default Re: new umpqua bags

    Looks like the 500 chest pack could be a winner. The shoulder straps with mesh back to hold the pack to your chest without wear on the neck. I have a Simms chest pack and it's the most uncomfortable thing to wear. Not that much weight in the pack but as the hours of the day pass, the more and more and more you are aware of the pack pulling on your neck. The Simms chest pack also sticks so far out that you have trouble seeing where you are placing your feet.

    If you want a chest pack I would give this model 500 a look. Stay away from the Simms.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Brookline, MA
    Posts
    1,241

    Default Re: new umpqua bags

    I think the orvis sling packs are far better than the umpqua bags. I have the Sling Guide Pack (for which I've posted a LENGTHY review on this site) and the Gale Force Sling. Both of these bags are exceptionally well made and hold tons of gear. I think the Guide Sling Pack is the best back out there right now if you carry a lot of gear with you.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Luggage/Bags
    By stuie675 in forum Other Gear
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-22-2013, 09:19 AM
  2. Bags / Packs
    By chart33 in forum Other Gear
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-14-2011, 09:32 PM
  3. wader bags under $100
    By kruggy1 in forum Other Gear
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-09-2009, 10:24 PM
  4. fish bags
    By gatesvt in forum Other Gear
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-09-2009, 12:54 PM
  5. Travel Wader/Rod Bags
    By abrysdam in forum Other Gear
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-16-2008, 10:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •