Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  3
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Line question

  1. Default Re: Line question

    Not sure if your line has anything to do with it? Maybe its too obvious but weight forward makes a huge difference

  2. #12

    Default Re: Line question

    Quote Originally Posted by learning2fly View Post
    Not sure if your line has anything to do with it? Maybe its too obvious but weight forward makes a huge difference
    With all due respect, you are mistaken. It is neither obvious or correct.

    A standard WF line is exactly like the DT for the first 30 feet, plus a DT continues to have the thick body so it loads more mass than a WF line as the casts get longer. So the WF would actually load the rod less with more line out.

    As the CCS measurement showed, the problem is not that the 4 wt fly line over loads his rod on long cast, it is that he cannot get the rod to load. So the rod is way underlined.

    The profile of a Cortland fly line is below



    The only difference would be a specialty WF line like a bass bug WF line has an extremely short front taper like a bass bug taper. The Scientific Anglers bass bug taper below has a 3.0 ft front taper vs an 8.0 front taper for the standard Cortland WF fly line above.



    According to the CCS measurement the rod is not even the 6 wt that is on the rod. Hence the need to borrow a 8/9 wt fly line to test the rod.
    Regards,

    Silver



    "Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought"..........Szent-Gyorgy

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Winchester CT
    Posts
    158

    Default Re: Line question

    Thank you for the charts, the technical information us starting to bring this together for me much better.

    And yes I am using a 6WF/F line on that rod, well not any longer

    I also have a grain scale, so I will be weighing the line later too, just to make sure what it is.
    Details Count

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Eastern Iowa
    Posts
    6,434

    Default Re: Line question

    Quote Originally Posted by silver creek View Post
    ....A standard WF line is exactly like the DT for the first 30 feet, plus a DT continues to have the thick body so it loads more mass than a WF line as the casts get longer. So the WF would actually load the rod less with more line out.
    Silver, then what is the point of WF line? (other than the bass bug example)

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    quiet corner, ct
    Posts
    8,504

    Default Re: Line question

    Quote Originally Posted by ia_trouter View Post
    what is the point of WF line? (other than the bass bug example)
    For longer casts.... you can shoot more line with the thin running line than you can with the fat belly DT.
    The simpler the outfit, the more skill it takes to manage it, and the more pleasure one gets in his achievements. --- Horace Kephart

  6. Likes N/A liked this post
  7. #16
    turbineblade Guest

    Default Re: Line question

    Bingo -- Rip hit it.

    I generally prefer a "standard" head length WF line for most conditions. However, for SH spey casts and long distance casts, I like the longer head WF lines quite a bit.

    If you fish big water like I often do, the WF is really the way to go. The ability to stand far back on a flat and really toss a streamer out to the fish is a benefit here -- it's a lot easier to shoot a WF running like out there. HOwever, I don't generally like the extreme WF lines (bass taper, SW taper, etc.) because I don't fish particularly large flies often. If I did, they would be a good choice.

    If you fish smaller water, the difference between a DT and WF line is minimal or non-existent (given the same front taper, etc.), so take your pick.

  8. #17

    Default Re: Line question

    Quote Originally Posted by Rip Tide View Post
    For longer casts.... you can shoot more line with the thin running line than you can with the fat belly DT.
    Exactly! +2

    Read what Bruce Richards of Scientific Anglers has to say about DT vs WF lines:

    "Almost all WF lines have heads that are 35-40 feet long. Add a 9-foot leader and the distance to the fly from the end of the head is 44- to 49-feet. Up to this distance when both DT and WF lines control and roll cast the same. There are not many typical trout fishing situations that require longer casts. What this all means is that DT and WF lines work pretty much the same at the distances we fish most often. "

    Double Taper Versus Weight Forward: Which is Really Better? | Fly Fishing Info Center

    So unless you need the extra distance of a WF line or the front weighting of a bass bug taper, get a DT fly line. As a practical matter I use DT for 4 wt rods and below and WF for 5 wt and above.

    If you need to save money, you can even make your own WF fly lines. We used to do that in the old days and you can still do that now.

    When I began fly fishing, I didn't have much money. Both my wife and I fly fished, so it required two of every piece of equipment. One place I could save was to make my own fly rods, so I made two graphite rods from a Fenwick HMG blanks.

    I also made my own WF fly lines from a single DT fly line and Cortland running fly line. It is very simple. Cut the DT fly line in half. Remove the coating from the back end with acetone and form a loop with the core by forming a loop and whip finishing it with nylon thread. Then coat the whip finish with flexible Pliobond cement.



    Do the same by cutting the package of shooting fly line in half and forming a loop with it's core using the method above.

    Connect the two loops and you have a home made WF fly line. You can reuse the running line and replace the section of DT fly line as it wears out.

    I use Cortland 444 running line that comes in several diameters so you can tailor it to the weight of DT line you are using.





    Cortland 444SL Classic Running Line at BEARSDEN.COM

    If you do not need two WF lines, you can keep the half section of DT line on the spool and store it in a ziplock bag for later use.

    With this system, you can make the front section as long as you want. If half of a DT line is too much, keep cutting back the line until is perfect for your casting style.

    It seems to me that the Welded Joint Repair of joining two section of fly line could make 2 relatively seamless home made WF fly lines from a single DT fly line. Once you fine tune the front section of DT, you can weld the running line to make a seamless custom WF line.

    The running line portion of WF fly lines rarely wear out completely. With the next WF fly line that wears out, I'm going to see if I can cut it and weld it back together. If that works, I have some DT fly line that I can measure and cut to see if I can make a welded WF line a DT and the old WF running line.
    Regards,

    Silver



    "Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought"..........Szent-Gyorgy

  9. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Winchester CT
    Posts
    158

    Default Re: Line question

    Picked up some 9wt line, problem solved
    Details Count

  10. Likes ia_trouter liked this post
  11. #19

    Default Re: Line question

    [QUOTE=ctshooter;612868]So anyone near NW CT have an 8/9 wt rod that I can borrow the reel for a few casts to verify my theory about this rod, before I go out and buy more line that is not correct?
    QUOTE]

    I was going to make that suggestion before I read to the bottom of the page and saw you had thought of it. In our casting club there are some very good casters, and yet at times they are puzzled by the difficulties that some rods provide. A change of even 1 weight of line is sometimes all that is needed.
    Is there a fishing club or chapter of FFF or TU nearby? It would be nice to get a second opinion on the choice of the bette weight line.

  12. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Winchester CT
    Posts
    158

    Default Re: Line question

    I will be getting together with the local TU, education is a great thing.

    As far as this rod, I could probably take it down to an 8 easy, but that is not what I want, so this will probably see a lot of closet time. I have always used ultra light gear for my spinning rods, bass fishing with 2lb test line. So I'm trying to head in the same direction with fly, I would love to find a 6'6" 2wt for the Brookie streams.
    Details Count

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. fly line question
    By rogue runner in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-25-2013, 06:30 PM
  2. Fly Line Question
    By pikefisher69 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-23-2013, 05:46 PM
  3. line to rod question
    By cdaxj in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-08-2011, 10:08 AM
  4. Line question
    By NEMNflythrower in forum Fly Lines
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-15-2009, 12:23 PM
  5. Rod wt. and line wt. question
    By Ken43 in forum Fly Rods
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-10-2006, 09:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •